LaWanda Walters – Three Ekphrastic Poems

Walters LE P&W August 2024

Download PDF Here

Live Encounters Poetry & Writing August 2024

Three Ekphrastic Poems by LaWanda Walters.


Into the World There Came a Soul Called Ida

After the painting by Ivan Albright in the Art Institute of Chicago

I love that title, and I know
that’s how Mr. Albright thought of me.
I was Ida, the woman in the painting
you may have seen. I was proud of it
and used to go to the museum
to try and explain it to visitors
who shuddered at the horror.
That was just the style he painted in,
like the picture of Dorian Gray
he did for the movie.

He wasn’t fond of clear skin.
He wanted me dissolute, irreparable.
He loved decay. He learned, in the First
World War, how to paint things
that would make my stomach turn.

He fell in love with me. But I laughed
when I read his love poem.
I couldn’t help it. You know when you try
not to laugh, like in church, and it gets worse?
That’s what happened.

He paid me to sit three hours a day for two years.
I was nineteen, and I brought my baby sometimes.
If I didn’t bring her, I was so bored.
I’d bring peanuts and eat them, let the shells
fall on the floor. It’s not like he wasn’t getting
paint and turpentine everywhere.

But the peanut shells must have made him mad.
And my rejection. And he didn’t want to let me go.
So he kept adding things on—cellulite and varicose
veins and a cigarette with smoke rising
from a cut-glass ashtray. He had this brush

with only three hairs, from a boar
or some other animal. He loved detail,
and details are what we get when we age.
So he made me fifty and fat and like
I’d been a prostitute. But it was only me,
sitting for him at nineteen and twenty
and sometimes my beautiful baby girl
would be in the basket on the floor.

That’s the true story, which you’ll think
is more boring than you’d hoped.
I never did smoke or drink, myself,
and if I thought that fifty looked old—why,
I lived to be in my nineties.
I never did get those veins, and I had
better metabolism than he’d planned on.
I stayed thin and never had that overhang
of cleavage like the lady in the painting.

But that peanut shell on the floor—
that shell is the truth, painted so exactly right
with his miniature, three-haired brush
that it makes me blush now.
How rude of me to throw them there
like I was sitting in a movie theatre.


Student, 1968, by Wayne Thiebaud

I was that student in 1968,
although my hips were wider.
But I sat like that in Victorian Lit,
unaware of how I’d like it, later,

Victorian literature. The student
in this work keeps her narrowed eyes open
while, in that class in Charlotte, I couldn’t.
This California girl looks a little sullen.

She’s blonde, her straight hair parted neatly.
She stares like she knows she’s on display,
her feet apart in blue tennis shoes,
faded jeans tight on her thighs

in the valley’s light. Her lap becomes
a canvas—between her legs, a shadow
might be a golf tee, even a slit. A rainbow
is glancing off her collarbone.

I was bored. The professor was bald,
and his talk on Matthew Arnold wasn’t
thrilling. I could not believe my friend
was having an affair with this married,

dull professor. But Wayne Thiebaud,
standing where a professor would,
painted her as the play of shade
and light on a body—an insight which

he’d had as a boy, too poor to buy the pastry
shining like the moon through plate glass.
What’s luscious transcends the bakery window.
Crisco’s likeness to oil paints is witchery.


The Logical Conclusion of Diebenkorn’s Distances

Richard Diebenkorn, Prisoners’ Harbor, Santa Cruz Island (1961)

I’d like to walk down a ways, see the distant
building which seems to be a Victorian bungalow
with its own view of the bay. But the foreground
of this painting is a tall, roseate wall. The viewer

is near-sighted, then far-sighted—the maybe bungalow
cannot be inspected closely. The antique-white rococo
of it remains unresolved. We can still peer over
the wall. The green that could be a tennis lawn is besmirched

by an offhand black stroke that can’t be inspected either.
The black mark reclines across a part of the green beyond
the wall. The angle’s a slash, so it is not a tennis net.
The black brushstroke ruins the logic of a fence.

The stroke of black paint lolls and laughs at realism.
At the same time I think it’s very real—that frustration,
that buzzer saying wrong. This logic, that of a fence
or the knowledge of perspective, won’t hold here. But maybe

it is the logic of vision. Wallace Stevens made frustration
the whole point. Yet he also said this racist thing I won’t
repeat about a poet. It’s painful to admire the nicer knowledge of
Belief, that what it believes in is not true.

But when he said this racist thing I won’t repeat,
why could he not apply it to his own belief?
What was his true belief about who should not
be crowned a great poet? Here are the limits of vision.

© LaWanda Walters

LaWanda Walters is the author of Light Is the Odalisque (Press 53, Silver Concho Poetry Series, 2016). Her poems have appeared or are forthcoming in Poetry, Georgia Review, Southern Review, Nine Mile, Antioch Review, Cincinnati Review, Ploughshares, Shenandoah, Laurel Review, and several anthologies, including Best American Poetry 2015, Obsession: Sestinas in the Twenty-First Century, and I Wanna Be Loved by You: Poems on Marilyn Monroe. She received Ohio Arts Council Individual Excellence Awards in 2020 and 2024. She lives in Cincinnati with her husband, poet John Philip Drury.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.